Coffee Shop

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF VINE MEALYBUG

Larry_IconFor years I have attended educational meetings in which the vine mealybug (Planococcus ficus) was portrayed as some kind of super-pest. I was told why it was so much worse than the grape mealybug and also why biological control would not work on it. In fact, I was told this as recently as last month by an entomologist with a Ph.D. from U.C. Berkeley.

I believed it, more or less. I had a few doubts because almost every species of mealybug on almost every permanent crop almost everywhere in the world can be managed with biological control. The vine mealybug’s closest relative, the citrus mealybug, is controlled biologically in California citrus groves with the very same parasite that attacks the vine mealybug in vineyards.

In case there is any confusion, when I say “biological control” I am referring to the control of pests by other organisms as opposed to any type of spray or pheromone.

When I first began controlling the vine mealybug I relied primarily on neonicitinoid insecticides applied through drip irrigation. Then, when Movento became available, I switched to that insecticide because the mealybugs appeared to be developing some resistance to the neonicitinoids. At no time did I recommend exclusive reliance on biological control.

Vine mealybug.

Vine mealybug.

However, for a variety of reasons I had two growers in 2016 who did not apply any insecticide to control mealybugs in vineyards with very sizeable populations of vine mealybug. In one of the vineyards I fully expected the grower to lose his crop. In each vineyard it was easy to find wet trunks with vine mealybug colonies under the bark.

To my surprise, as the vine mealybugs moved off of the trunk and on to the fruit and leaves they were heavily parasitized by a small wasp named Anagryus pseudococci. In one vineyard in Acampo it was unusual to find more than one or two mealybug nymphs on a leaf rather than an entire colony. It was also unusual in that vineyard to find fruit clusters with any mealybugs or sooty mold at all.

It reminded me of a famous quote which has been attributed to Mark Twain. When asked if he believed in baptism he replied “I don’t have to believe in it, I’ve seen it done.” I didn’t have to believe in biological control of vine mealybug, I had seen it done!

I couldn’t believe what I was seeing and wanted to have someone else look at these vineyards to make sure that I wasn’t crazy. I contacted University of California biological control specialist Kent Daane to look at both vineyards and he made a trip to Lodi in September, 2016 to do just that. I also invited Stephanie Bolton, the new grower programs coordinator at the Lodi Winegrape Commission, to join us. I wanted witnesses!

Shortly after entering the Acampo vineyard Kent observed that it had the highest level of parasitization of vine mealybugs that he had ever seen. He said that virtually every vine mealybug he found was parasitized. He also noted that the parasite was even attacking very young, small mealybug nymphs that are usually too small to be parasitized. He then collected samples for DNA analysis to compare them with other strains of the Anagyrus parasite that he and other U.C. biocontrol specialists had introduced into California from other countries.

The second vineyard that we visited that morning was in Clarksburg. In that vineyard the Anagyrus strain was not attacking the very young, small nymphs like in Acampo but rather was parasitizing mid-sized nymphs. Kent also collected parasite samples from this second vineyard for DNA analysis.

A couple of months later I was sharing these observations with a group of pest control advisors in Tulare. Joe Barcinas, the proprietor of the Foothill Agricultural Research insectary in Corona, was there and he asked if he could come to Lodi and collect some parasites from the first vineyard to rear in his insectary.

In mid-December Joe made his first-ever visit to Lodi and collected the strain of Anagyrus parasite that was successfully parasitizing the small, young vine mealybug nymphs. Once again I invited Stephanie to join us to familiarize herself with the insectary-rearing process. Joe then took the parasites back to Corona to begin rearing them for sale to grape growers who are interested in using biological control.

Despite this unexpected biological control success, I am not recommending that growers rely exclusively on biological control for their vine mealybug management program. The reason is that the vine mealybug population can get quite high on the vine trunks because the bark helps to shield them from the parasite’s activity. Then, if the biological control were to fail there could be a potential mass migration of mealybugs from the trunk on to the leaves and fruit.

Rather, I am recommending Integrated Pest Management of the vine mealybug. We have all heard the term IPM for so many years that with overuse we may have forgotten what it really means. The “integrated” part of the term refers to the integration of several different control methods in unison to achieve management of a pest. In this case pesticides can be used, but the grower should be mindful to only use pesticides that will not affect the parasites that are also attacking the vine mealybug. We are therefore “integrating” biological and chemical control.

One advantage of combining control methods is that if a few mealybugs develop resistance to the pesticide there are still biocontrol agents in the vineyard that can control them. This combination slows the development of resistance by the pest to the pesticide.

When I say that a grower should only use pesticides that will not harm the parasites, I am not just referring to pesticides for the control of vine mealybug. It is also important to choose pesticides for the control of other pests, such as mites, that do not harm the parasites of the vine mealybug. If you do not know which pesticides are harmful to parasites you can find that information here: http://ipm.ucanr.edu/PMG/r302900111.html.

Stephanie Bolton has started a new workgroup at the Lodi Winegrape Commission for growers who are interested in exploring this topic. She can be contacted at (209) 367-4727 or stephanie@lodiwine.com.

Larry Whitted is an independent pest control adviser with experiencing managing mealybugs throughout California, Egypt, Chile and Argentina. He can be reached at (209) 327-6472 or Lrwhitted@aol.com.

Anagyrus photo can be found here: http://www.far-inc.com/.


Have something interesting to say?  Consider writing a guest blog article!

To join the Lodi Growers email list, send an email to stephanie@lodiwine.com with the subject “grower email subscribe” or click on “join our email list” to the right.

To receive Lodi Grower news and event promotions by mail, send your contact information to stephanie@lodiwine.com or call 209.367.4727.

For more information on the wines of Lodi, visit the Lodi Winegrape Commission’s consumer website, lodiwine.com.

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF VINE MEALYBUG”

  1. I have never believed M.B. to a a super bug in wine grapes as it can be managed.

    I do believe what growers use in their fields impact beneficials, the largest is Sulfur and other PM materials. For some reason those products are not on impact list? I still do not know how to shy away from these products?

    I have and am still involved with several organic vineyards, all of those sites have full time flower and beneficial cover crops. They are infected with M.B at levels that make the fruit unmarketable, except for the fact that they winery owned and all the fruit is harvested. There is parasitization is high but the level does not impact the population enough and it continues to grow. All products used do impact beneficials except Sulfur so why the high populations?

    I have a belief you might be lucky so what gives?

    • If you aren’t getting adequate biological control of vine mealybug in an organic vineyard the most common reason is that ants are interfering with the parasites’ activity.

Event Calendar